000 02564nam a22002777a 4500
001 DSM00085
005 20250423111035.0
008 230111b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020 _a9781412813402
040 _cCity Schools Division of Dasmariñas
082 _a170.'.42 W73m 2010
100 _aWren, Thomas E.
245 _aMoral obligations: actions, intention, and valuation
250 _arev. ed.
264 _c2010
_aNew Brunswick U.S.A.
_bTransaction Publishers
300 _aix, 139 pages ; 23 cm
500 _aOriginally published: Agency and urgency. New York: Precedent Pub., 1974
500 _aNotes: Revised edition of Agency and Urgency: the origin of moral obligation. New York: Precedent Pub., 1974
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520 _aSummary: There are many ways of writing about the moral life; Moral Obligations follow the way of what philosophers call "meta-ethics": the analysis, not of particular moral problems, but of how the concepts used in formulating and solving them, concepts like "right" and "obligatory," have significance and power over us. The meta-ethical part of this book is preceded by a discussion of action, in which Wren lays the foundations for the argument that moral obligation is a part of the formal structure of human agency. Wren's argument is practical and social-psychological: it is to help all, starting with those who are already committed to some version of the ethic of individual dignity, to promote interagency fellowship and peace as a result of seeing a certain truth, namely, the truth that the urgency of their feelings of moral obligation derives from an unspoken intention to belong to a community of agents. Moral Obligations begin with the philosophy of action, and then it reviews the historical debate about the nature of obligation and its social context. This is followed by a section about action in general: it establishes the standpoint of the agent and makes an inventory of several species of action. Later chapters summarize the foregoing themes, with emphasis on the unspoken side of the intention, and develop them in conjunction with an analysis of the hypothetical imperative. The work closes with a discussion of the dilemma of membership in competing moral communities. -- ‡c From the publisher's description
_bContents: Action Intention Valuation Obligation The moral community The moral domain
650 _xEthics
650 _xMorale
650 _xDuty
650 _xethics (philosophy)
942 _2ddc
_cBK
999 _c1739
_d1739